The impact of the “National target program on new rural development” on household income: The case of Go Quao district, Kien Giang province

Pham Chi Hieu * and Pham Le Thong

* Corresponding author (chihieupham@gmail.com)

Article Sidebar

Full Text: PDF

Received: 16 Aug 2017
Revised: 02 Nov 2017
Accepted: 20 Jul 2018
Published: 31 Jul 2018
DOI: 10.22144/ctu.jen.2018.019
Views
119
Downloads
50
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
How to Cite
Pham, C. H., & Pham, L. T. (2018). The impact of the “National target program on new rural development” on household income: The case of Go Quao district, Kien Giang province. CTU Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development , 54(09), 16-22. https://doi.org/10.22144/ctu.jen.2018.019
Issue
No. 09 (2018)
Section
Economics

Main Article Content

Abstract

The present study aimed at evaluating the impact of the National Target Program on New Rural Development on the household income in Go Quao district, Kien Giang province where had been selected as a pilot site of the program in the province since 2010. Data in the analysis came from a survey on 194 households at study site. The survey was conducted in 2015 to collect the retrospective data on the income of households and socio-economic characteristics of households and communities from 2010 to 2014. Then, the Difference in Differences (DiD) estimator associated with the random effects model were applied to explore the impact as well as the determinants of household income. Estimation results showed that the impact was positive and significant in the first year but turns to insignificant afterwards. The household income is increasing during 2011 – 2013 and mainly dependent on the transportation infrastructure of the community and the participation in agricultural cooperatives. In addition, since household income mainly came from agricultural production, labor and landholding were also key predictors of income.
Keywords: impact evaluation, National Target Program on New Rural Development, difference in differences, household income, Go Quao

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

Ellis, F., 2000. The determinants of rural livelihood diversification in developing countries. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 51(2): 289-302.

General Statistics Office, 2015. The Statistical Yearbook in 2014. The Statistics Publisher, Hanoi.

Go Quao People’s Committee, 2014. Report of the socio-economic development in 2013 and plan of development in 2014.

Khandker, S. R., Bakht, Z., & Koolwal, G. B., 2009. The poverty impact of rural roads: evidence from Bangladesh. Economic Development and Cultural Change. 57(4): 685-722.

Kien Giang Statistics Office, 2014. Kien Giang Statistical Yearbook in 2013.

Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, 2015. Yearly report of rice industry of Vietnam in 2014 and prospect in 2015.

Mu, R., & van de Walle, D., 2011. Rural roads and local market development in Vietnam. The Journal of Development Studies. 47(5): 709-734.

Narayan, D., & Pritchett, L., 1999. Cents and sociability: Household income and social capital in rural Tanzania. Economic development and cultural change. 47(4): 871-897.

The Prime Minister, 2010. The National Target Program of New Rural Development during 2010 – 2020, issued with the Decision No. 800/QĐ-TTg of the Prime Minister.

Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D., 2000. Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. The World Bank research observer. 15(2): 225-249.

Wooldridge, J. M., 2010. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press.

Yamauchi, F., 2014. Roads, labor markets, and human capital: evidence from rural Indonesia. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, WPS7139.