Factors influencing online learning motivation of students at Can Tho University
and
*
Article Sidebar
Full Text: 
PDF
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study explores the factors influencing students' motivation for online learning at Can Tho University. The research examines five key factors: personal, lecturer-related, institutional, academic, and environmental aspects. A survey was conducted with 892 students across various academic disciplines. The study employed statistical analyses, including Cronbach’s Alpha reliability testing, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and multiple regression analysis to determine the impact of these factors on students' motivation. The findings indicate that personal and lecturer-related factors have the most significant positive influence, highlighting the importance of self-discipline, time management, and lecturer support. Institutional factors also play a crucial role, particularly in terms of learning infrastructure and support services. However, environmental factors negatively affect motivation, such as poor internet connectivity, financial difficulties, and distractions, which hinder students’ engagement. Additionally, students with higher academic performance and greater online learning experience show stronger motivation. Differences across academic disciplines suggest the need for tailored teaching methods and institutional support. These findings provide insights into enhancing online learning motivation and contribute to policy recommendations improving the quality of online education at Can Tho University.
Article Details
Conflict of Interest
© 2026 The authors. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Berestova, A., Burdina, G., Lobuteva, L., & Lobuteva, A. (2022). Academic motivation of university students and the factors that influence it in an E-learning environment. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 20(2), 201-210. https://doi.org/10.34190/ejel.20.2.2272
Berland, M., Baker, R. S., & Blikstein, P. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics: Applications to constructionist research. Tech Know Learn, 19, 205-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9223-7
Bhuttah, T. M., Xusheng, Q., Abid, M. N., & Sharma, S. (2024). Enhancing student critical thinking and learning outcomes through innovative pedagogical approaches in higher education: the mediating role of inclusive leadership. Scientific Report, 14(1), 24362. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-75379-0
Cheng, B., Wang, M., Moormann, J., Olaniran, B. A., & Chen, N.-S. (2012). The effects of organizational learning environment factors on e-learning acceptance. Computer & Education, 58(3), 885-899. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.014
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE bulletin, 3, 7. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED282491.pdf
Gaeta, M. L., Teruel, M. P., & Orejudo, S. (2012). Motivational, volitional and metacognitive aspects of self regulated learning. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 10(1), 73-94.
Garrison, D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines: Jossey-Bass.
Gedera, D., Williams, J., Wright, N. (2015). Identifying factors influencing students’ motivation and engagement in online courses. In: Koh, C. (Eds.), Motivation, Leadership and Curriculum design. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-230-2_2
Hamidah, N. (2022). Factors affecting students’motivation in online class. Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia, 14(2), 355-368. https://doi.org/10.21274/ls.2022.14.2.355-368
Meşe, E., & Sevilen, Ç. (2021). Factors influencing EFL students’ motivation in online learning: A qualitative case study. Journal of Education Technology & Online Learning, 4(1), 11-22. http://doi.org/10.31681/ jetol.817680
Rienties, B., & Toetenel, L. (2016). The impact of 151 learning designs on student satisfaction and performance: social learning (analytics) matters. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the sixth international conference on learning analytics & knowledge (pp. 339-343). http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2883851.2883875
Schunk, D. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 159-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308219
Lavidas, K., Komis, V., & Achriani, A. (2022). Explaining faculty members’ behavioral intention to use learning management systems. Journal of Computers in Education, 9(4), 707-725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00217-5
Tang, H., Yang, Y., & Bao, Y. (2023). Understanding college students’ achievement goals toward using open educational resources from the perspective of expectancy–value theory. Distance Education, 44(4), 675-693.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2023.2267464
Zhang, D., Zhao, J. L., Zhou, L., & Nunamaker Jr, J. (2004). Can e-learning replace classroom learning? Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 75-79.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). Goal setting: A key proactive source of academic self-regulation. In Motivation and self-regulated learning (pp. 267-295). Routledge.