Sub-disciplinary variation in the move structure of English-medium research article introductions in applied linguistics

Do Xuan Hai *

* Corresponding author (dxhai@ctu.edu.vn)

Article Sidebar

Full Text: PDF

Received: 22 Mar 2016
Revised: 27 Apr 2016
Accepted: 30 Mar 2017
Published: 31 Mar 2017
DOI: 10.22144/ctu.jen.2017.001
Views
184
Downloads
67
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
How to Cite
Do, X. H. (2017). Sub-disciplinary variation in the move structure of English-medium research article introductions in applied linguistics. CTU Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development , (05), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.22144/ctu.jen.2017.001
Issue
No. 05 (2017)

Main Article Content

Abstract

This article reports on a recent corpus and genre-based investigation of the move structure in research article introductions (RAIs) in two constituent areas of inquiry in applied linguistics, namely language teaching & learning and pragmatics & discourse analysis. The corpus consists of 30 RAIs extracted from 30 parent empirical research articles written by English native speakers and published in high impact English-medium applied linguistics journals between 2011 and 2013. The analytical tool was developed both with reference to Swales’ (1990, 2004) CARS models and a preliminary examination of the corpus built for this particular study. Findings revealed sub-disciplinary corpus-based variations of this schematic structure, both at the move and step tiers.
Keywords: CARS framework, genre analysis, move structure, research article introductions

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

Anthony, L., 1999. Writing research article introductions in software engineering: how accurate is a standard model? IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. 42(1): 38-46.

Atai, M.R., Habibi, P., 2012. Genre analysis of applied linguistics reearch article introductions: Exploring sub-disciplinary variations. Taiwan ESP Journal. 4(1): 25-44.

Atkinson, D., 2004. Contrasting rhetoric/contrasting cultures: Why contrastive rhetoric needs a better conceptualization of culture. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 3(4): 277-289.

Bax, S., 2011. Discourse and genre. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Bhatia, V.K., 1993. Analysing genre. London: Longman.

Duszak, A., 1994. Academic discourse and intellectual styles. Journal of Pragmatics. 21: 291-313.

Fox, E., Alexander, D.A., 2009. Text comprehension: A retrospective, perspective and prospective. In Israel, S.E., Duffy, G.G., (Eds.). Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 227-239). New York: Routledge.

Gao, L., 2014. Research article introductions in applied linguistics: A comparison between Chinese and English. Asian ESP Journal. 10(1): 104-136.

Hai, D.X., 2015. English-medium research article introductions in applied linguistics: An investigation into the move structure. CTU Journal of Science, 41(C): 9-18.

Hall, E.T., 1976. Beyond culture. New York: Anchor.

Hinds, J., 1983. Contrastive rhetoric: Japanese and English. Text. 3: 183-195.

Jalilifar, A., 2010. Research article introductions: Sub-disciplinary variations in applied linguistics. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills. 2(2): 29-55.

Kachru, B.B., 1985. Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In Quirk, R., Widdowson, H., (Eds.). English in the world (pp. 11-30). Cambridge: CUP.

Kanoksilapatham, B., 2005. Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes. 24: 269-292.

Kanoksilapatham, B., 2015. Distinguishing textual features characterizing structural variation in research articles across three engineering sub-discipline corpora. English for Specific Purposes. 37: 74-86.

Khany, R., Tazik, K., 2010. A comparative study of Introduction and Discussion sections of subdisciplines of Applied Linguistics research articles. Journal of Applied Language Studies. 1(2): 97-122.

Lee, S., 2001. A contrastive rhetoric study of Korean and English research paper introductions. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Illinois, USA.

Mullany, L., Stockwell, P., 2010. Introducing English language: A resource book for students. New York: Routledge.

Nwogu, K.N., 1997. The medical research papers: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes. 16(2): 119-138.

Ozturk, I., 2007. The textual organization of research article introductions in applied linguistics: Variability within a single discipline. English for Specific Purposes. 26(1). 25-38.

Pho, P.D., 2013. Authorial stance in research articles. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Safnil, A., 2013a. A genre-based analysis of Indonesian research articles in the social sciences and humanities written by Indonesian speakers. Journal of Multicultural Discourses. 8(3): 234-254.

Safnil, A., 2013b. A genre-based analysis of the introductions of research articles written by Indonesian academics. TEFLIN Journal. 24(2): 180-200.

Samraj, B. 2002. Introductions in research articles: variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes. 21(1): 1-17.

Samraj, B., 2005. An exploration of a genre set: Research article abstracts and introductions in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes. 24(2): 141-156.

Schneider, K.P., Barron, A., 2013. Pragmatics of discourse. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Suntara, W., 2013. Rhetorical variations in research article abstracts and introductions in linguistics and applied linguistics. Unpublished PhD thesis. Suranaree University of Technology, Thailand.

Swales, J.M., 1990. Genre Analysis. Cambridge: CUP.

Swales, J.M., 2004. Research genres. Cambridge: CUP.