A clinically-oriented 2D image-analysis system for appearance-based aesthetic outcome evaluation of breast reconstruction surgery
Main Article Content
Abstract
Aesthetic outcome of reconstructed breasts is currently rated subjectively by plastic surgeons, which introduces inter-rater bias and variability; thus, an image-based objective technique is desired. Developing such a technique, however, has been challenging due to the limited availability of reconstructed breast images under standardized conditions, and the complexity of assessing multiple aesthetic viewpoints. In this study, we propose a clinically-oriented two-dimensional (2D) image-analysis system where small fingerprint pairs representing the left and right breasts are extracted from conventional 2D chest images obtained in clinical settings and used as training data for a simple convolutional neural network (CNN), aiming for high effectiveness even with a limited number of cases. We extracted 16 type variations of fingerprints from 170 cases, and evaluated their influence on CNN performance. The optimal fingerprint types varied depending on the aesthetic viewpoint. The overall aesthetic score, calculated by aggregating the best-performing model scores across all viewpoints, showed a strong correlation (r > 0.9) with the average rater scores. Although 2D images capture only partial breast appearances and may not fully represent intrinsic three-dimensional (3D) features, the experimental results strongly support the potential of the proposed system for developing appearance-based models for aesthetic evaluation in clinical settings.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Cardoso, M. J., Cardoso, J., Amaral, N., Azevedo, I., Barreau, L., Bernardo, M., Christie, D., Costa, S., Fitzal, F., Fougo, J. L., Johansen, J., Macmillan, D., Mano, M. P., Regolo, L., Rosa, J., Teixeira, L., & Vrieling, C. (2007). Turning subjective into objective: The BCCT.core software for evaluation of cosmetic results in breast cancer conservative treatment. The Breast, 16(5), 456–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2007.05.002
Guo, C., Smith, T. L., Feng, Q., Benitez-Quiroz, F., Vicini, F., Arthur, D., White, J., & Martinez, A. (2022). A fully automatic framework for evaluating cosmetic results of breast conserving therapy. Machine Learning with Applications, 10, 100430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2022.100430
Harada, K., Yoshimoto, T., Duong, N. P., Nguyen, M. N., Sowa, Y., & Fukuzawa, M. (2023). A New Integrated Medical-Image Processing System with High Clinical Applicability for Effective Dataset Preparation in ML-Based Diagnosis. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1950, 41–50. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7666-9_4
Heil, J., Carolus, A., Dahlkamp, J., Golatta, M., Domschke, C., Schuetz, F., Blumenstein, M., Rauch, G., & Sohn, C. (2012). Objective assessment of aesthetic outcome after breast conserving therapy: Subjective third party panel rating and objective BCCT.core software evaluation. The Breast, 21(1), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2011.07.013
Preuss, J., Lester, L., Saunders, C. (2012). BCCT.core – Can a computer program be used for the assessment of aesthetic outcome after breast reconstructive surgery?. The Breast. 21(4), 597–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2012.05.012
Rasband, W. S. (n.d.). ImageJ. https://imagej.net/ij/
The GIMP Development Team. (n.d.). GIMP - GNU Image Manipulation Program. https://www.gimp.org/
The MathWorks, Inc. (n.d.). MATLAB. https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html
Yano, K. (2007). Cosmetic results after breast reconstruction (in Japanese). Japanese Journal of Clinical Medicine, 65(6), 465–468