Chitaranjan Laishram Singh and Priyanka Chand Bhatt *

* Corresponding author: Priyanka C. Bhatt (email: pia@saturn.yzu.edu.tw)

Main Article Content

Abstract

Generative AI (GenAI) is redefining the technological architecture of enterprise digital transformation, yet its domain structure and convergence topology remain uncharacterized at the patent level. This study applies a three-stage patent analytics pipeline- Cooperative Patent Classification domain mapping, keyword-rule topic assignment across 15 GenAI application archetypes, and weighted co-occurrence network analysis- to 9,692 Lens.org patent records from ten jurisdictions, of which 7,623 published from 2018 onward form the analytical corpus. Filings grew at a compound annual rate of 42% over 2018–2025. Domain mapping identifies Computing & Information Systems (69.5%), AI & Machine Learning (36.5%) and Business & Commerce (25.2%) as a three-layer infrastructure, model and application stack. Large language model development and retrieval-augmented generation together account for 64.5% of filings, while agentic AI and edge inference clusters remain under 1% each. The co-occurrence network (26 nodes, 151 edges, density 0.465) identifies Computing & Information Systems as the dominant convergence hub (composite score 0.759) and Healthcare Informatics as a structural broker (betweenness 0.138) disproportionate to its filing volume. Cross-domain patenting peaked at 2.34 domains per patent in 2021 and moderated to 1.65 by 2025. The findings extend general-purpose technology convergence theory to GenAI and provide a structural map for technology managers.

Keywords: CPC domain analysis, digital transformation, generative artificial intelligence, patent co-classification network, technology convergence

Article Details

Author Biographies

Chitaranjan L. Singh, Department of Information Management, Yuan Ze University

Chitaranjan L. Singh is a Master's student at Department of Informaiton Management, Yuan Ze University.

Priyanka C. Bhatt, Department of Information Management, Yuan Ze University

Dr. Priyanka C. Bhatt is an Assistant Professor, affiliated with Department of Information Management, Yuan Ze University. Her areas of expertise include, technology management, patent analytics, natural language processing and Application of Generative AI.

References

Afifuddin, M., & Seo, W. (2024). Predictive modeling for technology convergence: A patent data-driven approach through technology topic networks. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 188, 109909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2024.109909

Bubeck, S., Chandrasekaran, V., Eldan, R., Gehrke, J., Horvitz, E., Kamar, E.,… & Zhang, J. (2023). Sparks of artificial general intelligence: Early experiments with GPT-4. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.12712. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.12712

Chkirbene, Z., Hamila, R., Gouissem, A., & Devrim, U. (2024). Large language models (LLM) in industry: A survey of applications, challenges, and trends. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 21st International Conference on Smart Communities: Improving Quality of Life Using AI, Robotics and IoT (HONET) (pp. 229–234). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HONET63146.2024.10822885

Curran, C.-S., Bröring, S., & Leker, J. (2010). Anticipating converging industries using publicly available data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(3), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.10.002

Curran, C.-S., & Leker, J. (2011). Patent indicators for monitoring convergence: Examples from NFF and ICT. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(2), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.06.021

Fan, W., Ding, Y., Ning, L., Wang, S., Li, H., Yin, D., Chua, T. S., & Li, Q. (2024). A survey on RAG meeting LLMs: Towards retrieval-augmented large language models. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) (pp. 6491–6501). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3637528.3671470

Gambardella, A., & Torrisi, S. (1998). Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets? Evidence from the electronics industry. Research Policy, 27(5), 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00062-6

Gao, Y., Xiong, Y., Gao, X., Jia, K., Pan, J., Bi, Y., Dai, Y., Sun, J., Wang, M., & Wang, H. (2024). Retrieval-augmented generation for large language models: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.10997. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.10997

Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Antunes Marante, C. (2021). A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1159–1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639

Jung, S., Kim, K., & Lee, C. (2021). The nature of ICT in technology convergence: A knowledge-based network analysis. PLOS ONE, 16(7), e0254424. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254424

Lewis, P., Perez, E., Piktus, A., Petroni, F., Karpukhin, V., Goyal, N., Küttler, H., Lewis, M., Yih, W., Rocktäschel, T., Riedel, S., & Kiela, D. (2020). Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 33, pp. 9459–9474). https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/hash/6b493230205f780e1bc26945df7481e5-Abstract.html

Ma, D., & Wu, W. (2024). Does artificial intelligence drive technology convergence? Evidence from Chinese manufacturing companies. Technology in Society, 79, 102715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102715

McKinsey & Company. (2023). The state of AI in 2023: Generative AI's breakout year. McKinsey Global Survey on AI. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai-in-2023-generative-ais-breakout-year

McKinsey & Company. (2024). The state of AI in early 2024: Gen AI adoption spikes and starts to generate value. McKinsey Global Survey on AI. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai-2024

Mohammadi, N., Heidary Dahooie, J., Bengari, A. A., & Rahimi, A. (2025). Mapping the technological evolution of generative AI: A patent network analysis. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 45690. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-26810-7

OECD. (n.d.). OECD AI Policy Observatory. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://oecd.ai

Parteka, A., & Kordalska, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence and productivity: Global evidence from AI patent and bibliometric data. Technovation, 125, 102764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102764

Plekhanov, D., Franke, H., & Netland, T. H. (2023). Digital transformation: A review and research agenda. European Management Journal, 41(6), 821–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.09.007

Sindhu, B., Prathamesh, R. P., Sameera, M. B., & KumaraSwamy, S. (2024). The evolution of large language model: Models, applications and challenges. In Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Current Trends in Advanced Computing (ICCTAC) (pp. 1–8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCTAC61556.2024.10581180

Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 30, pp. 5998–6008). https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/3f5ee243547dee91fbd053c1c4a845aa-Abstract.html

Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003

World Intellectual Property Organization. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence: Patent landscape report. WIPO. https://doi.org/10.34667/tind.49740

Zhu, C., & Motohashi, K. (2022). Identifying the technology convergence using patent text information: A graph convolutional networks (GCN)-based approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, 121477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121477