Do Thanh Nhan * , Nguyen Thanh Loan and Huynh Nguyen Bao Ngoc

* Corresponding author (nhanm1616031@gstudent.ctu.edu.vn)

Main Article Content

Abstract

Nowadays, the number of English students is on the rise and English teachers need to be well-equipped with knowledge and flexibility so that they could have the best practices in their classroom. The teachers being appraised and getting feedback from students are able to adapt to different teaching contexts and to ensure that their students have profound understandings of what is taught thanks to increased teaching motivation and social recognition. The major aim of teacher appraisal and learner feedback is to develop teachers professionally in order to improve their delivery of lessons in schools. The effectiveness of the process of teacher appraisal and learner feedback is, however, dependent on the perceptions of the teachers themselves. Teacher appraisal gives teachers the motivation to move forward, but in some cases, it creates an invisible barrier for teachers as a result of their subjective thought. Likewise, feedback from students proved to be positive occasionally affects teachers in negative ways. With a view to addressing this problem, a study in this field was conducted with both qualitative and quantitative methods of research, which were employed to give the answers to the mentioned question, namely questionnaires and interviews. These instruments were delivered to 7 high school teachers, 18 English teachers and 100 students at an English language centre in Can Tho. The study aimed to identify whether teachers develop profession and accordingly assist English teachers in realizing how appraisal affects teachers’ feeling and how to adjust their practices in the real settings exposed to learner feedback.
Keywords: Teacher appraisal, student feedback, Teacher professional development

Article Details

References

Analoui, F., and Fell, P., 2002. Have you been appraised? A survey of the university administrative staff. The International Journal of Educational Management, 16(6): 279-287.

Bartlett, S., 2000. The development of teacher appraisal: A recent history. British Journal of Educational Studies, 48(1): 24-37.

Brennan, J., and Williams, R., 2004. Collecting and using student feedback. A guide to good practice. Learning and Teaching support network (LTSN). The Network Centre, Innovation Close, York Science Park. York, YO10 5ZF, 17.

Danielson, C., 2001. New trends in teacher evaluation. Educational leadership, 58(5): 12-15.

Donaldson, C., and Stobbe, C., 2000. Teacher evaluation: a self-directed, inquiry-based approach. Thrust for Educational Leadership, 29(3): 30-32.

Fisher, M., 1995. Performance appraisals. London: Kogan, pp. 210-211.

Gass, S. M., and Mackey, A., 2000. Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Routledge.

Goe, L., 2013. Quality of teaching. In: J. Hattie and E. Anderman (Eds.). International guide to student achievement. New York: Routledge, pp. 237-239.

Hattie, J., 2002. A review of the research on interventions for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: What works best?. Review of Educational Research, 72(1): 61-99.

Haynes, G., Wragg, C., Wragg, T., and Chamberlin, R., 2003. Threshold Assessment: The experiences of teachers who were unsuccessful in crossing the threshold. Research papers in education, 18(1): 25-44.

Kermally, S., 1997. Book review: Marketing Strategies: New Approaches, New Techniques.

Kumar, S., and Phrommathed, P., 2005. Research methodology. Springer US, pp. 43-50.

Lam, S. F., 2001. Educators’ opinions on classroom observation as a practice of staff development and appraisal. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(2): 161-173.

McKeachie, W. J., 1975. Assessing teaching effectiveness: Comments and Summary. Fust International Conference on Improving University Teaching, Heidelberg, Germany.

Motswakae, R. J., 1990. A study of strategies for the introduction of staff development and appraisal scheme in secondary schools in Scotland and comparisons with comparable developments in Botswana. Unpublished MEd dissertation. Moray House College: Scotland Centre for Education Overseas.

Murdock, G., 2000. Introducing a teacher-supportive evaluation system. ETL Journal: An International Journal for Teachers of English Speakers of other Languages, 54:54-64.

Mullins, L. J., 2007. Management and organisational behaviour. Pearson education.

Smylie, M. A., 2014. Teacher evaluation and the problem of professional development. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 26(2).

Tuinamuana, K., 2011. Teacher professional standards, accountability and ideology: Alternative discourses. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(12): 72-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n12.8.

Wilson, J.P., and Western, S., 2001. Performance appraisal: An obstacle to training and development? Career Development International, 6: 93-100.