Southeast asian studies as a field of study: A look from ideas behind the sociology of knowledge and inter-disciplinary debates
Main Article Content
Abstract
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Bates, R., 1997. Area Studies and the Discipline: A Useful Controversy? PS: Political Sciences and Politics. 30(2): 166-169.
Baylis, J., Smith, S.,Owens, P., 2004. The Globalization of World Politics, Fifth Edition. Oxford University Press. New York, 636 pages.
BBC News, 2014. What Is Jihadism? accessed on 22 January 2016. Available from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-30411519
Bloodworth, D., 1970. An Eye for the Dragon: Southeast Asia Observed: 1954-1970.Farrar, Straus & Giroux. New York, 414 pages.
Emmerson, D.K., 1984. Southeast Asia: What’s in A Name. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies. 15(1): 1-21.
Featherman, D., Vinovskis, M.A. (Eds), 2001. Social Science and Policy-making: A Search for Relevance in the Twentieth Century. University of Michigan Press. Michigan, 228 pages.
Foucault, M., Sheridan, A., 1995. Discipline and Punish: the Birth of the Prison, Second Edition. Vintage Books. New York, 333 pages.
Jazeel, T., 2015. Between area and discipline: progress, knowledge production and the geographies of geography, accessed on 22 January 2016. Available from http://phg.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/10/22/0309132515609713.abstract?rss=1
Jimenez, J., 2010. A Brief History of South Korean Propaganda Blasts, accessed on 22 January 2016. Available from http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1993376,00.html
Kook, L.S., 2013. Contentious Development: Southeast Asian Studies in Singapore. In Woo, P.S., and King, V.T. (Eds). The Historical Construction of Southeast Asian Studies: Korea and Beyond. ISEAS. Singapore, pp. 159-175.
Kuijper, H., 2010. Area Studies versus Disciplines: Towards an Interdisciplinary, Systematic Country Approach. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences. 3(7): 205-216.
King, V.T., 2013. British Perspectives on Southeast Asia and Continental European Comparisons: The making of a region. In Woo, P.S., and King, V.T. (Eds). The Historical Construction of Southeast Asian Studies: Korea and Beyond. ISEAS. Singapore, pp. 265-316.
Lagemaat, R., 2014. Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma, Second Edition. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge (UK), 656 pages.
Lee, C., 2013. Remembering the Colonial Period and the Korean War, accessed on 22 January 2016. Available fromhttp://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20130228000631&mod=skb
Ludden, D., 1997. The Territoriality of Knowledge and the History of Area Studies, accessed on 23 November 2015. Available from http://www.sas.upenn.edu/~dludden/areast1.htm
McCarthy, E.D., 1996. Knowledge as Culture: The New Sociology of Knowledge, First Edition. Routledge. New York, 144 pages.
O’Meara, P., Mehlinger, H., Newman, R. (Eds), 2010. Changing Perspectives on International Education, First Edition. Indiana University Press. Indiana (USA), 440 pages.
Scobell, A., 2005. North Korea’s Strategic Intentions. US Army War College: Strategic Studies Institute. Pennsylvania (USA), 41 pages.
Szanton, D. (Ed), 2004. The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines. University of California Press. California, 435 pages.
Swee-Hock, S., 2006. A review of Southeast Asian Studies in China. In Swee-Hock, S. and Wong, J. (Eds). Southeast Asian Studies in China. ISEAS publisher in association with East Asian Institute (NUS). Singapore, pp. 1-7.
Szilak, I., 2012. Meeting, Everywhere, the Rulers of North Korea, accessed on 22 January 2016. Available fromhttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/illya-szilak/rulers-of-north-korea-travel_b_1718186.html
Zaheer, K., 2013. Definition of a shaheed, accessed on 22 January 2016. Available from http://www.dawn.com/news/1057801