Tan Hung Nguyen , Kyra Kamille A. Toledo and Trong-Phuoc Huynh *

* Corresponding author (htphuoc@ctu.edu.vn)

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examined the performance of pavement, considering geogrid’s position within the pavement layers, geogrid’s axial stiffness, and applied stress through the Plaxis 2D program. Results showed that the position of the geogrid has a significant effect on the pavement performance. Using geogrid at the top of the base layer produced a deformation of 2.357 mm, and one at the top of the subbase had a deformation of 2.433 mm. Thus, the use of geogrid on the top of the base layer could provide the highest effectiveness on the pavement performance. Additionally, the geogrid’s axial stiffness had a slight impact on the performance of reinforced pavement. When the axial stiffness increased 2.5 times, the deformation of the pavement decreased only about 0.061 mm. The response of the stress-strain of the reinforced pavement was found to be nonlinear for the static applied stress and to be linear for the dynamic applied stress. The results obtained in this study were theoretically extracted using finite element analysis and the discussions were based on those. Therefore, further studies for the pavement reinforced with geogrid by experiments in the laboratory and on-site should be carried out to understand the impact of geogrid on pavement performance.

Keywords: Axial stiffness, finite element analysis, geogrid, pavement reinforcement,, Plaxis 2D

Article Details

References

Aga, S. Y. (2021). Physical stabilization of expansive subgrade soil using locally produced geogrid material. SN Applied Sciences, 3(5), 568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04560-1

Ahirwar, S. K., & Mandal, J. N. (2017). Finite element analysis of flexible pavement with geogrids. Procedia Engineering, 189, 411-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.05.065

Alimohammadi, H., Zheng, J., Schaefer, V. R., Siekmeier, J., & Velasquez, R. (2021). Evaluation of geogrid reinforcement of flexible pavement performance: A review of large-scale laboratory studies. Transportation Geotechnics, 27, 100471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100471

Al-Jumaili, M. (2017). Finite element modelling of asphalt concrete pavement reinforced with geogrid by using 3-D Plaxis software. Trends in Transport Engineering and Applications, 3(1), 1-9.

Bohagr, A. A. (2013). Finite element modeling of geosynthetic reinforced pavement subgrades (Master Thesis). Washington State University. https://hdl.handle.net/2376/102831

Faheem, H., & Hassan, A. (2014). 2D Plaxis finite element modeling of asphalt-concrete pavement reinforced with geogrid. Journal of Engineering Sciences, Assiut University, Faculty of Engineering, 42, 1336-1348. https://doi.org/10.21608/jesaun.2014.115106

Jasim, A. F., Fattah, M. Y., Al-Saadi, I. F., & Abbas, A. S. (2021). Geogrid reinforcement optimal location under different tire contact stress assumptions. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 14(3), 357-365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-020-0145-6

Kawalec, J., Gołos, M. & Mazurowski, P. (2018). Environmental aspects of the implementation of geogrids for pavement optimisation. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 356, 012018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/356/1/012018

Kuo, C.-M., & Huang, C.-W. (2006). Three-dimensional pavement analysis with nonlinear subgrade materials. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 18(4), 537-544. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:4(537)

Lu, Z., Yao, H.-L., Liu, J. & Hu, Z. (2014). Experimental evaluation and theoretical analysis of multi-layered road cumulative deformation under dynamic loads.
Road Materials and Pavement Design
, 15(1), 35-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2013.852609

Nazari, R. & Dabiri, R. (2016). Comparison of geotextile layers effects on static and dynamic behavior of pavement. Journal of Structural Engineering and Geotechnics, 6(1), 15-22.

Patil, C.C. & Shivananda, P. (2017). Effect of axial stiffness of geogrid in the flexible pavement deformation through finite element analysis with Plaxis 2D. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 4(11), 375-379.

Rahman, M. T., Mahmud, K., & Ahsan, S. (2011). Stress-strain characteristics of flexible pavement by finite element method. International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering, 2, 233-240.

Sadiq, N., Hilal, M. M., & Fattah, M. Y. (2022). Analysis of asphalt geogrid reinforced pavement rutting by finite element method. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 961(1), 012049. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/961/1/012049

Sinmez, B. (2019). Characterization of geogrid reinforced ballast behavior through finite element modeling. USF Tampa Graduate Theses and Dissertations. University of South Florida. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/etd/7946

Susanto, H. A., Yang, S.-H., & Duc, M. A. (2022). Performance evaluation of geogrid in flexible pavement using mechanical-empirical design approach. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 15(2), 442-456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-021-00030-4

Vibhoosha, M. P., Bhasi, A., & Nayak, S. (2021). A review on the design, applications and numerical modeling of geocell reinforced soil. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 39, 4035-4057. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-021-01774-3

Zheng, L., Yao, H.-L., Wu, W.-P. & Ping, C. (2012). Dynamic stress and deformation of a layered road structure under vehicle traffic loads: Experimental measurements and numerical calculations. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 39, 100-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.03.002