Nguyen Anh Thi * and Phuong Hoang Yen

* Correspondence: Nguyen Anh Thi (email: nathi@ctu.edu.vn)

Main Article Content

Abstract

Tieng Anh:Task-based language teaching (TBLT) has been recently implemented as a potential language teaching method for language education in Vietnam. However, research into the training for teachers on the application of TBLT has remained scarce. This study, therefore, aims to examine how Vietnamese in-service teachers implement the insights from a one-shot training program on TBLT in their classroom-based teaching practices. Three in-service teachers at a university in Vietnam participated. Data were collected through a video-taped classroom observation activity. Findings indicate that the teachers on the whole were unable to transfer the theoretical knowledge of TBLT principles that they had built up during the training program into their actual teaching practices. In addition, the teachers failed to perform TBLT teaching roles throughout the lesson. Accordingly, this study suggests pedagogical implications and insights with regard to the issue of teacher training on TBLT in the context of language education in Vietnam.Tieng Viet:Phuong phap giang day co ten la "Task-based language teaching" (TBLT) duoc thuc thi gan day tai Viet Nam va duoc danh gia la mot phuong phap giang day ngon ngu rat tiem nang. Tuy nhien, den nay van khong co nhieu nghien cuu tim hieu ve hoat dong dao tao, tap huan giao vien de co the ung dung TBLT vao hoat dong giang day tren lop. Vi the, nghien cuu nay tap trung vao viec tim hieu muc do hieu qua cua hoat dong tap huan, cu the la hinh thuc tap huan ngan han (one-shot training) cho giao vien ve phuong phap TBLT, lieu giao vien co the ung dung duoc TBLT vao dieu kien giang day thuc te tren lop sau khoa tap huan hay khong. Ba giao vien giang day mon tieng Anh tai mot truong dai hoc o Viet Nam dong y tham gia vao nghien cuu. So lieu duoc thu thap thong qua hoat dong quay video ve hoat dong giang day cua giao vien tren lop. Ket qua nghien cuu cho thay nhin chung giao vien khong co kha nang thuc thi kien thuc TBLT (nguyen tac cot loi, vai tro giao vien) ma ho da duoc tap huan vao hoat dong giang day thuc te tren lop hoc cua minh. Tu ket qua do, nhom nghien cuu de xuat phuong huong, giai phap va ke hoach hanh dong cho hoat dong tap huan giao vien trong viec ung dung, thuc thi TBLT trong dieu kien giang day ngoai ngu tai Viet Nam.
Keywords: classroom practice, in-service teacher training, Task-based language teaching

Article Details

References

Adamson, B., & Davison, C., 2003. Innovation in English language teaching in Hong Kong primary schools: One step forward, two steps sideways? Prospect, 18(1): 27-41.

Bachman, L. & Palmer, A, 1996. Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Barnard, R., & Nguyen, V. G., 2010. Task-Based Language Teaching: A Vietnamese Case Study Using Narrative Frames to Elicit Teachers’ Beliefs. Language Education in Asia, 1(1): 77-86.

Breen, M, 1987. Learner contributions to task design. In C. Candlin & D. Murphy (Eds.), Language Learning Tasks (pp. 23-46). London: Prentice Hall.

Borg, S., 2003. Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36: 81-109.

Borg, S., 2006. Teacher cognition and language education. London, UK: Continuum.

Bygate, M., Skehan, P. & Swain, M. (Eds.). 2001. Researching pedagogical tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing. Harlow: Longman.

Burns, A., 1999. Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Canh, L., 2011. Form-focused instruction: A case study of Vietnamese teachers’ beliefs and practices. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis: The University of Waikato, New Zealand.

Carless, D., 1997. Managing systemic curriculum change: A critical analysis of Hong Kong’s target-oriented curriculum initiative. International Review of Education, 43(4), 349-366.

Carless, D., 2003. Factors in the implementation of task-based teaching in primary schools. System, 31(4): 485-500.

Caroll, J, 1993. Human Cognitive Abilities. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Creswell, W. J., & Creswell, D. J., 2018. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE publications India Pvt. Ltd.

Drijkoningen, J., 2017. Wheels of change: Insights into the professional development of teachers of Dutch as a second language. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis: KU Leuven, Belgium.

East, M., 2012. Task-based language teaching from the teachers’ perspective: Insights from New Zealand. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.

Eisendrath, H., 2001. Evaluatie van de lerarenopleiding in Vlaanderen 2000-2001. Brussels: Vrije Universiteit Brussel.

Ellis, R., 2003. Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis. R., 2009. Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221-246.

Ellis, R., & Shintani, N., 2014. Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research. London, England: Routledge.

Kam, H. W., 2004. English Language Teaching in East Asia Today: An Overview. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22(2), 1-22.

Littlewood, W., 2007. Communicative and task-based language teaching in East Asian classrooms. Lang. Teach, 40, 243-249.

Long, M, 1985. A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In: K. Hylstenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.). Modelling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition (pp. 77-79). Clevedon: Multilingual Matterns.

Long, M., 2015. Second Language Acquisition and Task-Based Language Teaching. Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell.

Markee, N., 1997. Second language acquisition research: A resource for changing teachers’ professional cultures? The Modern Language Journal, 81(1): 80-93.

Ministry of Education and Training [MoET], 2006. Chuong trinh giao duc pho thong: Mon Tieng Anh [English curriculum for the secondary school]. Hanoi, Vietnam: Education Publishing House.

Norris, J. M., 2016. Current Uses for Task-Based Language Assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36: 230-244.

Nunan, D, 1989. Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nunan, D., 2004. Task-based Language Teaching. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Peeters, K., & Van den Branden, K., 1992. Nascholing nascholing! Naar een professionalisering van de nascholing voor leraren. Leuven: Garant.

Richards, J., Platt, J. & Weber, H, 1985. Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics. London: Longman.

Skehan, P., 1996. A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 38-62.

Skehan, P., 2003. Task-based instruction. Language teaching, 36(1), 1-14.

Thornbury, S., 1999. How to teach grammar. Harlow: Longman.

Van den Branden, K., 2006. Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Van den Branden, K., 2009a. Diffusion and Implementation of Innovations. In: Long, M. H., & Doughty, C. J. (Eds.). The Handbook of Language Teaching, 559-672. Blackwell Publisher.

Van den Branden, K., 2016. Task-based language teaching. In G. Hall (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English Language Teaching, 238-252. New York: Routledge.

Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J., 2009. Task-based language teaching: A reader. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>